. David Straiton.
, 7a, Quarry Avenue,
Farndon.
Chester.
CH5.3NT.

Blog Details-Google search engine.
Scotland—A Proud Nation?? Hail Caledonia..

THIEVES(OR CHEATERS) NEVER PROSPER

There are two said gentlemen who are currently making sensational headlines in the media, the first is Gordon
Brown (does anyone remember him?) the second is Alistair Darling. In reference to my title they are candidates
For proving that the adage is a myth. Personally I feel so much contempt for both of them, they can challenge each
Other to a duel without my worries about the outcome. They can combine to compose a violin concerto as a result
Of their behaviour during their tenure of office in the English Government. On an examination of their record they conspired to “FIDDLE” as their country (alleged) was robbed of 6,000 square miles of its legal territorial waters.
They also “FIIDLED”as they made their illicit expenses claims. Finally they “FIDDLED” as their country
(SCOTLAND) suffered an apoplectic financial disaster.

When scrutinising the results of the English Parliament election of 2010 and comparing them with the Scottish
Election this year, the statistics give a true reflection on the voting patterns of the Scottish electorate for the two
Respective Parliaments, In the English election both Brown and Darling were voted back in with increased majorities.Oviously a tactical ploy to keep the Tories out of power; why else would a sensible public act in such an outrageous manner???? A direct constituency comparison is impossible owing to the differing arrangements of the
Constituencies for the two elections.
However based on a rough analysis one can construe the emergence of a rough pattern. First if we look
At the Brown situation, Kirkcaldy was a complete triumph for the S.N.P.In the case of Cowdenbeath we find that the S.N.P.dramatically reduced the Labour majority to just over a thousand. Thus we can establish the variations explicit
In the differing elections, revealing a phenomenal swing to the S.N.P. in the constituent parts of Brown’s “SAFE SEAT”.
Synonymous with this the picture in Darling’s “SAFE SEAT” resembles that of Brown`s.The main dissimilarity in comparing the two scenarios is that the S.N.P.in this year’s election turned almost the whole of Edinburgh into their
Own stronghold, wiping out what had previously been almost exclusive territory of the Lib-Dems.Another factor in
This complicated equation is that the voters of Darling’s constituency consistently voted for Labour in the Westminster
Elections, with a dramatic swing to the Lib-Dems for the Scottish Parliament in 2007.

In the final analysis what I have endeavoured to expose is a situation in which if I were a strategist for long term
Planning I would indulge in the maximum publicity for the content of Darling’s book, with emphasis on the quarrelling
Of the “TWO CHILDREN!” The objective is plain to see in Scottish terms why on earth should we vote for two individuals who apparently put their selfish interests ahead of working for the good of Scotland? In relation to the tremendous result in Inverclyde we can conclude that there is “NO SAFE SEAT” for Labour, including these two
“TRAITORS” who never batted an eyelid as they sold their country out. There is every chance given the circumstances that the next election for Westminster will be either penultimate or hopefully the last, therefore the party must aim for
the maximum representation at Westminster.